Environment ranking · World Bank

Freshwater Withdrawal

Egypt, Arab Rep. leads 177 ranked countries at 7750.0% (2022); the midpoint country sits at 8.8%.

7750.0%
Egypt, Arab Rep.
8.8%
Median
177
Countries ranked
374,022×
Top–bottom spread
% of resources Source: World Bank
Top 15 by Freshwater Withdrawal (% of resources)
  1. 1 Egypt, Arab Rep. 7750.0%
  2. 2 Bahrain 3877.5%
  3. 3 Turkmenistan 1868.0%
  4. 4 United Arab Emirates 1509.9%
  5. 5 Saudi Arabia 974.2%
  6. 6 Libya 817.1%
  7. 7 Sudan 673.4%
  8. 8 Qatar 446.4%
  9. 9 Mauritania 337.1%
  10. 10 Pakistan 326.0%
  11. 11 Uzbekistan 262.5%
  12. 12 Israel 204.0%
  13. 13 Syrian Arab Republic 195.8%
  14. 14 Yemen, Rep. 169.8%
  15. 15 Azerbaijan 160.5%

Full ranking — all 177 countries

Rank Country Value Year
1 Egypt, Arab Rep. 7750.0% 2022
2 Bahrain 3877.5% 2022
3 Turkmenistan 1868.0% 2022
4 United Arab Emirates 1509.9% 2022
5 Saudi Arabia 974.2% 2022
6 Libya 817.1% 2022
7 Sudan 673.4% 2022
8 Qatar 446.4% 2022
9 Mauritania 337.1% 2022
10 Pakistan 326.0% 2022
11 Uzbekistan 262.5% 2022
12 Israel 204.0% 2021
13 Syrian Arab Republic 195.8% 2022
14 Yemen, Rep. 169.8% 2022
15 Azerbaijan 160.5% 2022
16 Jordan 139.3% 2022
17 Iraq 120.5% 2022
18 Oman 116.7% 2022
19 Tunisia 92.1% 2022
20 Algeria 91.5% 2022
21 Barbados 87.5% 2022
22 Hungary 78.2% 2022
23 Netherlands 74.9% 2022
24 Niger 73.8% 2022
25 Malta 72.6% 2022
26 Iran, Islamic Rep. 72.3% 2022
27 Serbia 60.6% 2022
28 Cabo Verde 59.7% 2022
29 Somalia, Fed. Rep. 55.0% 2022
30 Moldova 52.2% 2022
31 St. Kitts and Nevis 50.8% 2022
32 South Africa 47.1% 2022
33 Korea, Rep. 45.0% 2022
34 Armenia 44.8% 2022
35 India 44.8% 2022
36 Afghanistan 43.0% 2022
37 West Bank and Gaza 41.2% 2021
38 Eswatini 40.5% 2022
39 North Macedonia 40.2% 2022
40 Zimbabwe 40.0% 2022
41 Kazakhstan 38.8% 2022
42 Lebanon 37.8% 2022
43 Morocco 36.5% 2022
44 Belgium 35.8% 2022
45 Bangladesh 34.2% 2022
46 Singapore 33.3% 2022
47 Dominican Republic 30.4% 2022
48 Cyprus 28.6% 2022
49 Turkiye 28.4% 2022
50 Spain 26.1% 2022
51 Bulgaria 25.9% 2022
52 Thailand 25.5% 2022
53 Sri Lanka 24.5% 2022
54 Germany 24.1% 2022
55 Mauritius 23.0% 2022
56 Viet Nam 22.8% 2022
57 Mexico 22.0% 2022
58 Eritrea 20.8% 2022
59 China 20.2% 2022
60 Kenya 19.5% 2022
61 Romania 19.2% 2022
62 Philippines 19.0% 2022
63 Japan 18.5% 2022
64 Italy 18.5% 2022
65 Cuba 18.3% 2022
66 Poland 17.5% 2022
67 Greece 17.3% 2022
68 Tajikistan 16.7% 2022
69 Portugal 16.1% 2022
70 United States 15.8% 2022
71 Kyrgyz Republic 15.8% 2022
72 Maldives 15.7% 2022
73 Denmark 15.6% 2022
74 St. Lucia 14.3% 2022
75 Timor-Leste 14.3% 2022
76 Korea, Dem. People's Rep. 12.9% 2022
77 Argentina 12.9% 2022
78 El Salvador 12.4% 2022
79 Jamaica 12.4% 2022
80 Puerto Rico (US) 12.3% 2022
81 France 12.2% 2022
82 Senegal 11.9% 2022
83 Haiti 11.1% 2022
84 Indonesia 11.0% 2022
85 Czechia 11.0% 2022
86 Dominica 10.0% 2022
87 Estonia 9.5% 2022
88 Botswana 8.9% 2022
89 Ukraine 8.8% 2022
90 Trinidad and Tobago 8.8% 2022
91 Ethiopia 8.6% 2022
92 Mali 8.6% 2022
93 Antigua and Barbuda 8.5% 2022
94 Malawi 8.4% 2022
95 St. Vincent and the Grenadines 7.9% 2022
96 Grenada 7.0% 2022
97 Burkina Faso 6.5% 2022
98 Rwanda 6.4% 2022
99 Djibouti 6.3% 2022
100 Tanzania 6.2% 2022
101 Chad 5.9% 2022
102 United Kingdom 5.8% 2022
103 Austria 5.7% 2022
104 Nigeria 5.6% 2022
105 Uruguay 4.9% 2022
106 Nepal 4.8% 2022
107 Ghana 4.8% 2022
108 Luxembourg 4.8% 2022
109 Slovak Republic 4.5% 2022
110 Slovenia 4.4% 2022
111 Switzerland 4.2% 2022
112 Belarus 4.2% 2022
113 Chile 4.0% 2022
114 Madagascar 4.0% 2022
115 Lao PDR 3.9% 2022
116 Ireland 3.4% 2022
117 Gambia, The 3.4% 2022
118 Myanmar 3.3% 2022
119 Costa Rica 3.1% 2022
120 Guatemala 3.0% 2022
121 New Zealand 3.0% 2022
122 Albania 3.0% 2022
123 Venezuela, RB 2.8% 2022
124 Finland 2.8% 2022
125 Burundi 2.8% 2022
126 South Sudan 2.5% 2022
127 Australia 2.4% 2022
128 Ecuador 2.2% 2022
129 Georgia 2.2% 2022
130 Paraguay 2.1% 2022
131 Zambia 2.0% 2022
132 Lithuania 1.9% 2022
133 Togo 1.9% 2022
134 Sao Tome and Principe 1.9% 2022
135 Cambodia 1.8% 2022
136 Croatia 1.8% 2022
137 Honduras 1.8% 2022
138 Namibia 1.7% 2022
139 Uganda 1.6% 2022
140 Peru 1.6% 2022
141 Cote d'Ivoire 1.5% 2022
142 Russian Federation 1.5% 2022
143 Mozambique 1.5% 2022
144 Sweden 1.5% 2022
145 Mongolia 1.3% 2022
146 Canada 1.3% 2022
147 Benin 1.3% 2022
148 Brazil 1.2% 2022
149 Malaysia 1.2% 2022
150 Colombia 1.1% 2022
151 Guinea-Bissau 1.1% 2022
152 Brunei Darussalam 1.1% 2022
153 Latvia 1.0% 2022
154 Panama 0.9% 2022
155 Bosnia and Herzegovina 0.9% 2022
156 Lesotho 0.8% 2022
157 Comoros 0.8% 2022
158 Nicaragua 0.8% 2022
159 Norway 0.7% 2022
160 Belize 0.7% 2022
161 Suriname 0.6% 2022
162 Guyana 0.6% 2022
163 Angola 0.5% 2022
164 Bhutan 0.4% 2022
165 Cameroon 0.4% 2022
166 Guinea 0.4% 2022
167 Fiji 0.3% 2022
168 Iceland 0.2% 2022
169 Sierra Leone 0.1% 2022
170 Bolivia 0.1% 2022
171 Gabon 0.1% 2022
172 Equatorial Guinea 0.1% 2022
173 Congo, Dem. Rep. 0.1% 2022
174 Liberia 0.1% 2022
175 Central African Republic 0.1% 2022
176 Papua New Guinea 0.0% 2022
177 Congo, Rep. 0.0% 2022

Primary source: World Bank Open Data, indicator code ER.H2O.FWTL.ZS (177 countries). Read methodology →

How is the Freshwater Withdrawal ranking compiled?

A ranking is a snapshot of relative position, not a fixed property of a country, and a few habits make it far more useful to read. Every country shown has a non-null observation for its most recent reporting year, and that year is not synchronised across the table, so two neighbouring rows may describe different points in time. The size of the spread between the top and the bottom tells you whether an indicator is structurally uneven across the world or broadly universal, and that shape is often more informative than any single rank. Where a value is expressed per capita or as a share, currency revisions and population updates can shift positions between releases. Treat the order as a starting point for questions, then open the underlying country profiles to understand why each sits where it does.

This ranking orders 177 countries by Freshwater Withdrawal, measured in % of resources. Egypt, Arab Rep. leads with 7750.0% (2022), while Congo, Rep. sits at the bottom with 0.0%. The midpoint country reports 8.8%, so any country below that mark falls in the lower half of the distribution and any above sits in the upper half. The spread between the top and bottom gives you an immediate sense of how unevenly this indicator is distributed across the Environment picture.

Freshwater Withdrawal is part of the Environment topic and is collected by World Bank. It is one of more than a thousand country-level indicators we track, drawn from official, publicly available statistical releases that undergo agency review. The most recent observations shown here are from 2022, reflecting the latest release cycle for this series. Because definitions, base years, and methodologies can change, the "Year" column is shown for every row — always check it before comparing two countries whose values come from different vintages.

Click any country name to open its full profile with hundreds more indicators in context, or use the Compare tool to pair any two countries from this table side by side. You can also browse all indicators inside the Environment topic from the breadcrumbs above to see which other measures move together with Freshwater Withdrawal. Data is licensed under CC BY 4.0 from World Bank, which means you may reuse the figures freely in articles, reports, and research so long as you credit the original agency.

How rankings are constructed: every country with a non-null observation for Freshwater Withdrawal in its most recent reporting year is included; countries with no data for that indicator are excluded from the ranking rather than imputed or interpolated. Ranks are dense (1, 2, 3 with no skips on ties) and ties break alphabetically by country name. The "Year" column carries the observation vintage because the world is not synchronous: some countries publish a 2024 figure for this indicator while others only have a 2021 or 2019 reading, depending on each statistical agency's release cycle and the country's own reporting compliance. We never carry-forward a stale year to make the ranking look complete.

What the spread tells you: when the gap between the top and bottom of a ranking is wide — say a 50× ratio between the leader and the median — the indicator is structurally uneven across the global income gradient. When the spread is narrow — a 2-3× ratio — the indicator is more universal, reaching most economies regardless of GDP per capita. Comparing the spread of Freshwater Withdrawal against peer indicators in the Environment topic is the fastest way to see which dimensions of development are converging globally and which remain stubbornly polarised.

Cross-checks before citing: if you plan to cite a figure from this ranking, open the source country's profile and confirm the year, the unit of measurement, and whether the underlying definition has changed in recent revisions. World Bank publishes definition notes alongside every series; the Environment chapter of the WDI metadata document is a good place to verify the boundaries of the variable. Be especially careful with per-capita figures (population denominators get revised after each census), GDP figures (PPP vs current-USD vs constant-USD make order-of-magnitude differences), and health indicators that switch between crude rates and age-standardised rates between releases.