Infrastructure ranking · World Bank

Access to Clean Water

Gibraltar leads 151 ranked countries at 100.0% (2024); the midpoint country sits at 80.6%.

100.0%
Gibraltar
80.6%
Median
151
Countries ranked
16×
Top–bottom spread
% of population Source: World Bank
Top 15 by Access to Clean Water (% of population)
  1. 1 Gibraltar 100.0%
  2. 2 Hong Kong SAR, China 100.0%
  3. 3 Hungary 100.0%
  4. 4 Iceland 100.0%
  5. 5 Kuwait 100.0%
  6. 6 Liechtenstein 100.0%
  7. 7 Macao SAR, China 100.0%
  8. 8 Monaco 100.0%
  9. 9 New Zealand 100.0%
  10. 10 Singapore 100.0%
  11. 11 San Marino 100.0%
  12. 12 Netherlands 100.0%
  13. 13 Denmark 99.9%
  14. 14 Germany 99.9%
  15. 15 Isle of Man 99.9%

Full ranking — all 151 countries

Rank Country Value Year
1 Gibraltar 100.0% 2024
2 Hong Kong SAR, China 100.0% 2024
3 Hungary 100.0% 2024
4 Iceland 100.0% 2024
5 Kuwait 100.0% 2024
6 Liechtenstein 100.0% 2024
7 Macao SAR, China 100.0% 2024
8 Monaco 100.0% 2024
9 New Zealand 100.0% 2024
10 Singapore 100.0% 2024
11 San Marino 100.0% 2024
12 Netherlands 100.0% 2024
13 Denmark 99.9% 2024
14 Germany 99.9% 2024
15 Isle of Man 99.9% 2024
16 Malta 99.8% 2024
17 United Kingdom 99.8% 2024
18 Sweden 99.8% 2024
19 Cyprus 99.7% 2024
20 France 99.7% 2024
21 Luxembourg 99.7% 2024
22 Finland 99.6% 2024
23 Slovenia 99.6% 2024
24 Slovak Republic 99.6% 2024
25 Belgium 99.5% 2024
26 Israel 99.5% 2024
27 Spain 99.5% 2024
28 Korea, Rep. 99.3% 2024
29 Norway 99.1% 2024
30 Estonia 98.9% 2024
31 Puerto Rico (US) 98.9% 2024
32 Bahrain 98.9% 2024
33 Austria 98.9% 2024
34 Japan 98.7% 2024
35 Virgin Islands (U.S.) 98.7% 2024
36 United Arab Emirates 98.6% 2024
37 Czechia 98.1% 2024
38 Chile 97.8% 2024
39 United States 97.6% 2024
40 Latvia 97.0% 2024
41 Canada 96.9% 2024
42 New Caledonia 96.9% 2024
43 Italy 96.8% 2024
44 Lithuania 96.7% 2024
45 Switzerland 96.7% 2024
46 Greece 96.7% 2024
47 St. Martin (French part) 96.6% 2024
48 Bulgaria 96.2% 2024
49 Ireland 96.1% 2024
50 Qatar 95.3% 2024
51 Portugal 95.2% 2024
52 Turkmenistan 94.9% 2024
53 Malaysia 94.7% 2024
54 Iran, Islamic Rep. 94.4% 2024
55 Guam 94.0% 2024
56 Belarus 93.1% 2024
57 Kazakhstan 91.5% 2024
58 Oman 91.1% 2024
59 Palau 90.8% 2024
60 Andorra 90.6% 2024
61 American Samoa 90.5% 2024
62 French Polynesia 90.4% 2024
63 Grenada 89.9% 2017
64 Jordan 89.0% 2024
65 Poland 88.7% 2024
66 Brazil 88.6% 2024
67 Ukraine 87.9% 2024
68 Croatia 87.3% 2024
69 Bosnia and Herzegovina 86.4% 2024
70 Montenegro 85.5% 2024
71 Romania 82.2% 2024
72 Armenia 82.1% 2024
73 Uzbekistan 81.9% 2024
74 Northern Mariana Islands 81.5% 2024
75 North Macedonia 80.8% 2024
76 West Bank and Gaza 80.6% 2024
77 Costa Rica 80.5% 2024
78 Morocco 80.0% 2024
79 Egypt, Arab Rep. 78.9% 2024
80 India 76.4% 2024
81 Russian Federation 76.3% 2024
82 Moldova 75.8% 2024
83 Serbia 75.0% 2024
84 Colombia 74.3% 2024
85 Kyrgyz Republic 73.9% 2024
86 Albania 70.8% 2024
87 Georgia 70.5% 2024
88 Ecuador 69.9% 2024
89 Trinidad and Tobago 69.4% 2024
90 Algeria 69.0% 2024
91 South Africa 68.0% 2024
92 Guyana 67.2% 2024
93 Korea, Dem. People's Rep. 66.6% 2023
94 Bhutan 65.6% 2024
95 Honduras 65.5% 2024
96 Tajikistan 65.1% 2024
97 Tunisia 65.0% 2024
98 Seychelles 64.7% 2024
99 Paraguay 64.4% 2024
100 Botswana 63.3% 2024
101 Samoa 62.5% 2024
102 Iraq 59.8% 2024
103 Myanmar 59.7% 2024
104 Bangladesh 59.1% 2024
105 Viet Nam 58.6% 2024
106 Azerbaijan 57.8% 2024
107 Suriname 55.8% 2024
108 Peru 49.4% 2024
109 Guatemala 48.8% 2024
110 Philippines 48.5% 2024
111 Gambia, The 48.2% 2024
112 Lebanon 47.7% 2024
113 Turks and Caicos Islands 47.0% 2024
114 Sri Lanka 46.9% 2024
115 Congo, Rep. 45.9% 2021
116 Dominican Republic 45.3% 2024
117 Pakistan 45.0% 2024
118 Mongolia 43.4% 2024
119 Mexico 43.0% 2024
120 Ghana 42.9% 2024
121 Fiji 42.1% 2024
122 Eswatini 38.2% 2024
123 Sao Tome and Principe 36.7% 2024
124 Cote d'Ivoire 36.4% 2024
125 Lao PDR 35.2% 2024
126 Tanzania 31.3% 2024
127 Lesotho 31.3% 2024
128 Afghanistan 30.6% 2024
129 Indonesia 30.5% 2024
130 Cambodia 30.0% 2024
131 Nigeria 29.9% 2024
132 Tonga 29.6% 2024
133 Mozambique 27.5% 2024
134 Senegal 27.2% 2024
135 Zimbabwe 25.5% 2024
136 Guinea-Bissau 24.0% 2024
137 Madagascar 22.1% 2024
138 Togo 20.5% 2024
139 Vanuatu 19.2% 2024
140 Nauru 18.7% 2024
141 Malawi 18.2% 2024
142 Uganda 18.1% 2024
143 Benin 17.7% 2024
144 Nepal 16.5% 2024
145 Kiribati 15.1% 2024
146 Ethiopia 13.5% 2024
147 Congo, Dem. Rep. 11.9% 2024
148 Sierra Leone 10.9% 2024
149 Tuvalu 8.7% 2024
150 Chad 6.3% 2024
151 Central African Republic 6.2% 2024

Primary source: World Bank Open Data, indicator code SH.H2O.SMDW.ZS (151 countries). Read methodology →

How is the Access to Clean Water ranking compiled?

A ranking is a snapshot of relative position, not a fixed property of a country, and a few habits make it far more useful to read. Every country shown has a non-null observation for its most recent reporting year, and that year is not synchronised across the table, so two neighbouring rows may describe different points in time. The size of the spread between the top and the bottom tells you whether an indicator is structurally uneven across the world or broadly universal, and that shape is often more informative than any single rank. Where a value is expressed per capita or as a share, currency revisions and population updates can shift positions between releases. Treat the order as a starting point for questions, then open the underlying country profiles to understand why each sits where it does.

This ranking orders 151 countries by Access to Clean Water, measured in % of population. Gibraltar leads with 100.0% (2024), while Central African Republic sits at the bottom with 6.2%. The midpoint country reports 80.6%, so any country below that mark falls in the lower half of the distribution and any above sits in the upper half. The spread between the top and bottom gives you an immediate sense of how unevenly this indicator is distributed across the Infrastructure picture.

Access to Clean Water is part of the Infrastructure topic and is collected by World Bank. It is one of more than a thousand country-level indicators we track, drawn from official, publicly available statistical releases that undergo agency review. The most recent observations shown here are from 2024, reflecting the latest release cycle for this series. Because definitions, base years, and methodologies can change, the "Year" column is shown for every row — always check it before comparing two countries whose values come from different vintages.

Click any country name to open its full profile with hundreds more indicators in context, or use the Compare tool to pair any two countries from this table side by side. You can also browse all indicators inside the Infrastructure topic from the breadcrumbs above to see which other measures move together with Access to Clean Water. Data is licensed under CC BY 4.0 from World Bank, which means you may reuse the figures freely in articles, reports, and research so long as you credit the original agency.

How rankings are constructed: every country with a non-null observation for Access to Clean Water in its most recent reporting year is included; countries with no data for that indicator are excluded from the ranking rather than imputed or interpolated. Ranks are dense (1, 2, 3 with no skips on ties) and ties break alphabetically by country name. The "Year" column carries the observation vintage because the world is not synchronous: some countries publish a 2024 figure for this indicator while others only have a 2021 or 2019 reading, depending on each statistical agency's release cycle and the country's own reporting compliance. We never carry-forward a stale year to make the ranking look complete.

What the spread tells you: when the gap between the top and bottom of a ranking is wide — say a 50× ratio between the leader and the median — the indicator is structurally uneven across the global income gradient. When the spread is narrow — a 2-3× ratio — the indicator is more universal, reaching most economies regardless of GDP per capita. Comparing the spread of Access to Clean Water against peer indicators in the Infrastructure topic is the fastest way to see which dimensions of development are converging globally and which remain stubbornly polarised.

Cross-checks before citing: if you plan to cite a figure from this ranking, open the source country's profile and confirm the year, the unit of measurement, and whether the underlying definition has changed in recent revisions. World Bank publishes definition notes alongside every series; the Infrastructure chapter of the WDI metadata document is a good place to verify the boundaries of the variable. Be especially careful with per-capita figures (population denominators get revised after each census), GDP figures (PPP vs current-USD vs constant-USD make order-of-magnitude differences), and health indicators that switch between crude rates and age-standardised rates between releases.