Guide · WDI 2024

Richest vs. Poorest Countries

According to World Bank WDI 2024, Monaco leads GDP per capita at $288,002 while United States leads total GDP. This page uses current US$, the series this extract stores.

Economy size is not living-standard dollars

According to World Bank WDI 2024, United States is #1 of 214 by total GDP ($28.8 trillion) at GDP-per-capita rank 12 ≠ Monaco #1 by GDP per capita ($288,002) at total-GDP rank 155.

$28.8 trillion
United States total GDP (#1)
#12
United States GDP per capita rank
$288,002
Monaco GDP per capita (#1)
#155
Monaco total GDP rank

Monaco is 1,332 times Burundi on this current-US$ per-capita series ($288,002 vs $216). The full table is /rankings/gdp-per-capita-current-usd. This extract has no PPP series.

Highest GDP per capita (current US$)

These eight rows are the top of NY.GDP.PCAP.CD among 214 reporters in WDI 2024. Total-GDP rank on the same vintage sits in the last column, so a living-standard leader can be a small economy.

#CountryGDP per capita
1MonacoWDI 2024$288,002
2LiechtensteinWDI 2024$220,167
3BermudaWDI 2024$142,250
4LuxembourgWDI 2024$137,782
5IrelandWDI 2024$112,895
6SwitzerlandWDI 2024$107,702
7Cayman IslandsWDI 2024$104,293
8SingaporeWDI 2024$94,897

Source: World Bank World Development Indicators, GDP per capita (current US$), indicator NY.GDP.PCAP.CD. Year is the latest observation per country. Open the full ranking.

Lowest GDP per capita (current US$)

Burundi is last of 214 at $216. A mixed year in this tail (a country whose latest observation is older than 2024) stays on the list with its own year; we do not carry values forward.

#CountryGDP per capita
214BurundiWDI 2024$216
213AfghanistanWDI 2024$417
212Central African RepublicWDI 2024$516
211MalawiWDI 2024$522
210MadagascarWDI 2024$550
209Somalia, Fed. Rep.WDI 2024$630
208Yemen, Rep.WDI 2018$634
207MozambiqueWDI 2024$657

Source: World Bank WDI NY.GDP.PCAP.CD. Subsistence and informal activity sit outside this series, so consumption can be higher than the official figure.

Why the Gap Is So Large

The income gap between rich and poor countries is not primarily about natural resources. The Democratic Republic of Congo has some of the world's largest reserves of cobalt, coltan, diamonds, and gold, and one of the lowest GDPs per capita. Qatar and Norway have oil; both are wealthy. But Qatar's wealth is concentrated and lightly distributed while Norway has used its oil revenues to build one of the world's largest sovereign wealth funds and a robust welfare state.

Research in development economics points to several factors that consistently predict long-run prosperity:

  • Institutions: Rule of law, contract enforcement, protection of property rights, and constraints on corruption allow markets to function and investment to compound over time.
  • Geography and disease burden: Tropical climates historically faced higher disease loads (malaria, yellow fever) that impeded labor productivity and foreign investment. Coastal access lowers trade costs.
  • Human capital: Education and health outcomes compound. A workforce that is well-educated and healthy produces far more than one that is not, and reinvests more effectively.
  • Conflict history: Wars destroy physical and human capital. Post-conflict reconstruction is slow, the legacy of a single civil war can depress growth for a generation.
  • Access to trade and capital: Countries integrated into global trade networks can specialize, import technology, and attract foreign investment. Landlocked countries without regional trading partners face structural barriers.

PPP vs. Nominal: How Much Does the Adjustment Matter?

PPP conversion would raise living-standard comparisons for lower-price countries, but this extract does not store a PPP series. India's current-US$ GDP per capita on NY.GDP.PCAP.CD is $2,695 in WDI 2024 (rank #163 of 214). A PPP figure for India would have to come from a series we do not hold, so this page does not type one.

For questions about material welfare inside a low-price country, a PPP series is the better tool, once you have one. For questions about financial capacity (foreign debt, cross-border contracts), current US$ is the honest unit, because those contracts settle in market exchange rates. This registry publishes the current-US$ ranking it can rebuild from NY.GDP.PCAP.CD.

Open the GDP per capita ranking and the comparison tool for the live current-US$ values.

The "Resource Curse" and Why Wealth Doesn't Always Transfer

Development economists coined the term "resource curse" to describe the paradox of countries with large natural resource endowments that nonetheless remain poor. Several mechanisms drive this pattern:

  • Dutch Disease: A resource export boom drives up exchange rates, making manufacturing and agriculture uncompetitive and crowding out diversification.
  • Rent-seeking: When wealth comes from resources rather than productivity, political energy goes into capturing resource rents rather than building productive institutions.
  • Volatility: Commodity prices are volatile. Governments that budget assuming high commodity prices face crises when prices fall, often forcing austerity exactly when economic support is most needed.
  • Conflict: Valuable resources attract armed groups. Many of the world's most persistent conflicts are financed by diamonds, oil, or minerals.

Countries that escaped the resource curse, Norway, Botswana, did so through early institution-building, transparent revenue management, and deliberate diversification strategies before resource wealth became dominant.

Is Convergence Happening?

Since 1990, several previously poor regions have experienced rapid catch-up growth. This extract's current-US$ series is a single vintage, so it cannot plot that history here. South Korea, Vietnam, Bangladesh, and Ethiopia are the usual named catch-up cases in the development literature; treat those names as history, not as a ranking from this page.

The pattern of convergence is uneven. Sub-Saharan Africa has seen income growth but also rapid population increases, which moderate per-capita gains. Conflict-affected states show little convergence. Middle-income countries can get stuck, the "middle-income trap" describes economies that grew quickly from poverty but struggle to transition to the high-skill, high-productivity activities that characterize rich nations.

Browse the indicators pages on PlainCountries to explore GDP per capita trends across 217 countries.

Frequently Asked Questions

Does this page rank GDP per capita at PPP?

No. PlainCountries stores World Bank NY.GDP.PCAP.CD (GDP per capita, current US$) and NY.GDP.MKTP.CD (total GDP, current US$). This extract has no PPP series, so a PPP ranking would be invented. PPP remains a useful living-standard idea; this page reports the current-US$ ranking the database actually holds.

Why do small high-income places sit at the top of GDP per capita?

Monaco is #1 of 214 at $288,002 in WDI 2024 current US$. Luxembourg is #4 at $137,782 on the same series, not #1. Small financial or tourism hubs can post very high output per resident; that is a statistical fact on this series, not a typical household income.

Is the gap between rich and poor countries getting larger or smaller?

The data shows a complex picture. In absolute dollar terms, the gap has widened because starting from a higher base, rich countries add more dollars per year even at modest growth rates. In relative terms, how fast poor countries are growing, the picture is more optimistic. East and South Asian countries have dramatically closed the gap since 1990. Sub-Saharan Africa has made less progress. The global extreme poverty rate has fallen sharply, but income inequality between countries remains very high.

What is purchasing power parity (PPP) and how is it calculated?

PPP is calculated by comparing the prices of a standardized basket of goods and services across countries. The World Bank International Comparison Program (ICP) conducts surveys every few years to establish PPP conversion factors, how many units of a local currency buy what $1 buys in the US. These factors convert GDP into international dollars. This registry does not store those converted series.

Can a country have high GDP per capita but poor average living standards?

Yes. High average income says nothing about distribution. A high current-US$ GDP per capita can come from concentrated resource rents or a dual workforce where migrant workers earn far less than citizens. Always check inequality measures (like the Gini coefficient) alongside the average.

How does the World Bank classify income groups?

The World Bank classifies economies annually using GNI per capita (Gross National Income, not GDP) in Atlas method US dollars. Thresholds adjust each year for inflation. Those GNI brackets are a World Bank classification, not a ranking computed from this extract's GDP series.

Sources

  • World Bank, World Development Indicators (WDI), GDP (current US$) NY.GDP.MKTP.CD and GDP per capita (current US$) NY.GDP.PCAP.CD
  • World Bank, International Comparison Program (ICP), PPP methodology (not stored in this extract)
  • Acemoglu, D. and Robinson, J.A., Why Nations Fail (2012), institutional theory of growth

This page is informational. Rankings rebuild from the World Bank WDI current-US$ series in this extract. PlainCountries does not make policy recommendations.

What to do with this

GDP per capita ranks countries by average income, but the gap only means something once you read it in context.

GDP per capita is an average; it says nothing about how income is distributed within a country. Figures are current-US$ World Bank WDI (NY.GDP.PCAP.CD), with the data year shown on each row. This extract has no PPP series.